Mystery Behind Obama's Scar

A photograph showing the scars Barack Obama President of the United States led the speculation recently. Is it true that the president underwent brain surgery

During Obama served as President of the United States, he had been marred by various questions and doubts about his background. Questions such as whether Obama is really an American, whether he is a Muslim, and whether he is an alien from another planet, has been frequently asked. The images reveal a scar on his head that raises other silly questions.



In the photo Obama appeared to have a long scar stretching from around the top of his head down to the back of his right ear. As a result, various sites on the Internet are now competing to make his theory respectively. Among these are, the injury was a bad influence hair shaving or because sisiran are not neat trick of light or maybe a birthmark.

When confirmed, a spokesman for the White House said it was not prepared for comment. According to him, the rumors are very stupid and can not be verified. (DSC / ANS / dailymail)

It turned out that Einstein's brain is preserved in More Than 20 Years

Einstein's name would be familiar to the ears of anyone else. Likewise, the theory of relativity. However, studies of brain physicist is certainly still a novelty and not many people know about it.

But it was Albert Einstein's brain is often used as objects of research and speculation. The brain of the greatest physicists figure in the 20th century was taken 7 hours after his death in 1955.

The brain is attracted worldwide attention because the reputation of Albert Einstein as a genius, and seems abnormalities and characteristic in his brain has a strong correlation with the ability of intelligence that led to the creation of many brilliant ideas in the world of physics and mathematics.

Concerning this preservation of brain and decision whether to get permission from the concerned is a broad matter of debate. In his biography, written by Ronald Clark (1971) said: "He was so approved for brain used as objects of research and also asked that his body was cremated."

But Ronald Clark's statement seems not quite appropriate, even taking even this brain has not received permission from the family parties. Permission of his son Hans Albert Einstein was granted after the decision is new, and even this is approved if the brain is only used for research activities and the results published in scientific journals of high quality.

Prof. Marian Diamond of dissected brain Einstein discovered that Einstein's brain is very similar to the brains of ordinary people. Einstein's brain is only slightly better trained in certain parts only.
Prof. Marian Diamond is a brain anatomist, from the University of California at Berkeley, has spent the past six months just to examine Einstein's brain. He is "busying himself" sort out the parts of the brain this physicist and count the cells.

On the left side of his genius brain is found found more glial cells per neuron than in normal brain. This may be a reason why Einstein was so smart, even if Professor Diamond is not so can tell.

As an illustration, there are two types of cells in the human brain. Neuronal cells, which perform the task of thinking and adjust the nerve, whereas glial cells or neuroglia function provides the "food" and perform work tasks that support neuronal cells.

Prof. Diamond get the idea to conduct the study after seeing a picture of Einstein's brain had been preserved, which is published in a science magazine.

The brain is preserved is owned by a pathologist from Missouri, USA. Thomas Hervey, the pathologist this was one of the doctors who conducted autopsies on these physicists, when Einstein died 18 April 1955 at the age of 76 years. It was not easy to take care of this preserved brain. The pathologist did not even intend to sell it. To persuade this pathologist, Prof. Diamond took over three years. That, too, not entirely. The professor only get four small slices of the brain.

However, Einstein's brain that was discovered back in 1978 it received wide attention, especially in the scientific world. The brain is in a stone bottle filled with liquid apple juice (cider) for more than 20 years.

TWO AMERICAN SOLDIERS KILLED IN Afghanistan

Two U.S. soldiers from the North Atlantic Treaty Organization (NATO) was shot dead Afghan border police in the northern part of the country, on Monday (4 / 4). The gunman is now a fugitive.

"According to initial reports, an Afghan border police uniforms opened fire on members of the ISAF (International Security Assistance Force) in the group," the NATO statement said.

The shooting occurred when Najamuddin, Afghan border police colonel, was in a meeting with several U.S. advisers. "Two U.S. soldiers were on guard outside the office together with one of our members," said Najm al-Din told the French news agency AFP.

"We heard gunfire. When he came out, we saw our men shot dead two U.S. soldiers and he ran away. We're checking," he said.

General Habibullah Sayedkhaily, border police brigade commander in Faryab, make sure the incident and expressed investigate how it happened.

In a series of previous events, members or pseudonym Afghan security forces killed a member of their foreign colleagues.

In November last year, an Afghan border police killed six American soldiers, who train local police. MUST READ, WAR CRIME

Nearly 140,000 foreign soldiers, most of NATO troops, deployed under the leadership of the United States, in Afghanistan to defeat the Taliban-led insurgency.

Some 81 members of parliament the United States, most members of the Democratic allies of the White House, in mid-March press President Barack Obama to attract the big superpower troops from Afghanistan in July 2011.

"Let's be clear. Withdrawal of a small number of U.S. troops from Afghanistan in July would not meet the expectations of Congress or the American people," said the group, all members of Parliament, in a letter to Obama.

Members of parliament, only four of them from Republicans, expressed support for Obama's plan began to withdraw U.S. troops from Afghanistan at the latest by July 2011, with the goal of transferring security to Afghan forces by 2014.

"We, members of Congress, believe that the future reduction of the number of U.S. troops in Afghanistan should be big enough and mean and implemented on a regular basis," they said.

The letter, made a member of Parliament from the Democrat Barbara Lee and advocacy groups announced Peace Step, appeared on the eve of the House of Representatives vote on a resolution calling on the termination of the war.

The letter noted that polls show the people of the United States strongly believes that war is not feasible, and the record high cost of crisis at a time when many government activities trimmed.

United States popular support for the war in Afghanistan dropped to its lowest level since Barack Obama became president, the poll said.

Quinnipiac University poll, which was launched in the middle of February, showed that 51-41 voters said the United States should not engage in Afghanistan. (Ant / ICH)

New Strategies Proven Powerful Libyan Army

Air attack coalition troops the UN Security Council, making Muammar Gaddafi in the Libyan troops were forced to change their strategy. This new strategy was proved successful repulse the rebels and drove them from most important cities in the country. Rape case in LIBYA, must READ!

As reported by the Associated Press pages, Gaddafi army overwhelmed the coalition air forces bombard them since two weeks ago. Fighter jet coalition led by the United States combat troops are often targeted device Gaddafi, and various combat vehicles.



According to a U.S. intelligence report that refused to be named, now Gaddafi's troops to leave all the heavy equipment, such as tanks and other armored vehicles, and replace them with ordinary vehicles. Among those used were a sedan and SUV, equipped with weapons in it.

This strategy to outwit the attention of coalition air forces, so as not to attack. In addition to the disguise, this tactic is also useful to cut the cost of logistics soldier, said members of U.S. intelligence.

Because of this new tactic, troops successfully repulsed Gaddafi rebel forces up to 160 km in just two days. Previously, the army said rebels had driven from their homes in the town of Sirte Gaddafi. Gaddafi also forces overran the town of Ras Lanouf back on Wednesday.

Army Gaddafi was reported by human rights body Human Rights Watch also laid land mines at various points in the city of Ajdabiya.

Without the help of coalition and NATO troops, rebel forces defeated the forces Gaddafi. one rebel leader, Abdullah Hadi, asking NATO to intervene.

"I ask only one NATO aircraft to repel them. What we need now is protection from the air. They should help us," said Hadi.

Meanwhile, the option of arming rebel army by coalition forces still continue to roll. U.S. Secretary of State, Hillary Clinton, said that the U.S. believes that arming the rebels is a legal act on the present situation. However, there has been no decision to do so.

"No decisions have been made regarding arming opposition groups in Libya. We do not reject that option, nor approve it," said White House spokesman Jay Carney

MORE RAPE NEWS IN LIBYA ? SEACH HIRE

U.S. bans imports of Japanese Food

The United States government announced on Tuesday, March 22, 2011, they banned the import of food from several places in Japan. Prohibition-related fears of radioactive contamination due to leakage of radiation at the Fukushima nuclear reactor.

As quoted from the pages of The Wall Street Journal, National U.S. Food and Drug Administration (FDA), has issued a ban and warning against all kinds of milk, dairy products, fresh vegetables, and fruits of several areas near the reactors.

These areas are the prefecture of Fukushima, Ibaraki, Tochigi and Gunma. Food products from these regions are not allowed to enter the U.S. market prior to first go through the testing process and declared safe by the FDA.

"In addition, FDA also will provide signs to all products from Japan to distinguish whether the goods come from the contaminated or not. The FDA will conduct testing on all food and goods from the cargo area," the FDA said through a statement.

New food sold in the U.S. allowed after through testing radiation levels.

The FDA also said the food testing team at various ports have been equipped with radiation detectors, called radiation pagers. "It is very sensitive and can help identify the cargo that has a certain radiation level," wrote the FDA again.

According to FDA records, food imports from Japan only four percent of all food imports into the U.S..

U.S. Concerns arose after the Japanese government found radiation levels above the normal level found in milk and 11 kinds of vegetables in the area of ​​Fukushima. This is caused by a radiation leak at Nuclear Power Fukushima Daiichi happened since the quake and tsunami hit Japan, 11 March.

The Japanese government has also suspended food shipments from Fukushima and the surrounding area to several other prefectures in the country

Albert Einstein's diary, OPEN SECRETS OF THE THEORY OF RELATIVITY!

The following diary of Albert Einstein when he first discovered THEORY OF RELATIVITY, but before he said "Once you begin to understand and truly master the thoughts and feelings, that's when you see HOW YOU CREATE YOUR OWN REALITY. Therein lies your freedom and BIGGEST POWER!

enjoy!

Is not an easy thing to tell the complete how do I get the theory of relativity. This is caused by the existence of diverse complexity that indirectly motivates human thought. I also do not want to convey in detail the development of my thoughts based on my scientific papers, but I will simply convey to you the essence of the development of these ideas.

I first got the idea to build a theory of relativity some 17 years ago (1905). I can not say exactly where these ideas came, but I'm sure this idea comes from the optical problem on moving objects. Light propagating in a sea of ​​ether and earth moving in the same ether. Therefore ether movement can be observed from Earth. But I never found one ether flow is observational evidence in the literature of physics. I am very motivated to prove the flow of the ether relative to the earth, in other words the earth movement in the ether. At that time I did not doubt the existence of ether and ether move it. Actually I expect the possibility of observation on the difference between the speed of light moving in the direction of motion of the earth and the light that move in opposite (with the help of a mirror reflection). My ideas can be realized by using a pair of thermocouples to measure the difference in their heat or energy. This idea is similar to Albert Michelson interference experiment, but the moment I am not so familiar with the Michelson experiment.

I am acquainted with the results-nil (null-result) Michelson experiment when I was a student and since then I was obsessed with my idea. Intuitively I feel that if we accept the result-nil then it will take us to the conclusion that our views about the earth moving in the ether is wrong. This is the first step that draws me toward the theory of special relativity. Since that time I began to believe that if the Earth moves around the sun, the movement can never be detected by experiments that use light.

In 1895 I read the papers Hendrik Lorentz who claims that he can solve the problems of electrodynamics completely through the first approach, ie an approach where the power of two or more of the ratio between object velocity and the speed of light is negligible. After that I tried to develop an argument Lorentz Armand Fizeau on experimental results by assuming that the equations of motion of electrons, as has been evidenced Lorentz, applicable in both the reference coordinate system on moving objects as well as on vakuum. I am confident with the validity of electrodynamics which is prepared by Maxwell and Lorentz, and I am very confident that they accurately describe the actual natural phenomena. What's more the fact that the same equation applies in the moving coordinate system and vakuum system, clearly show the invariance (no change) light. However, this conclusion is contrary to the law of velocity composition adopted for the moment. Why are the two basic laws contradict each other? The big problem is making me think hard. I have to spend a full year in vain in exploring the opportunity to modify the theory of Lorentz. This problem looks too heavy for me!

One day, a conversation with my friend in Bern help me solve this big problem. I visited on a sunny day and asked him: "Right now I'm faced with big problems that I think can never be resolved. Now I want to share this with you." I spent the various discussions with him. Suddenly I get a very important idea. The next day I said to him: "Thank you very much. I have solved all my problems."

My main idea for solving this problem with regard to the concept of time. Time should not be defined a priori as an absolute reality. Time to be dependent on the speed signal. This major problem can be solved with the new concept of time.

Only in five weeks for me to finish the principle of special relativity after the discovery. I also have no doubts about the validity of this principle from the philosophical side. Moreover, this principle is in accordance with the principle of Mach, at least partially when compared with the success of the theory of general relativity. This is how I build a theory of special relativity.

The first step towards the theory of general relativity appeared two years later (1907) in a different way.

I'm not too satisfied with the theory of special relativity because relativity principle is limited to the relative motion with constant velocity but can not be applied to motion in general. In 1907 I was asked by Johannes Stark to write a review of various experimental results from the theory of special relativity in its annual report Jahrbuch und der Radioaktivitaet Electronics. When asked to write this article I realized that the theory of special relativity can be applied to all phenomena of nature except gravity. I really want to find a way to apply this theory in the case of gravity. But I can not accomplish this with ease. One thing that frustrated me was the fact that although the theory of special relativity provides a perfect relation between inertia and energy, while the relationship between inertia and the weight (inertia and gravity systems) are not touched at all. I suspect that this problem is far beyond the scope of the theory of special relativity.

One day I was sitting on a chair at the Swiss Patent Office in Bern. This is when a brilliant idea crossed my mind. "A person in free fall will not know his weight." This simple idea gives me a deep thought. Wild emotions that hit me was pushing me toward the theory of gravity. I re-think, "Someone who has an acceleration in free fall." Observations made by this person actually done on an accelerated system. I decided to extend the principle of relativity to include acceleration. I also hope that, by generalizing this theory I will at once solve the problem of gravity. This is explained by the fact that people who do not feel the free fall due to the weight of other gravitational field that eliminates the Earth's gravitational field. In other words, every object that accelerated need new gravitational field.

Yet I can not solve this problem completely. I spent eight years to reduce real relationships. Before that, I just get the basic pieces of the theory.

Ernst Mach also claims the principle of equivalence between accelerated systems. But clearly this is not compatible with regular geometry. This is because if the system-system of this kind is allowed, then Euclidean geometry is not applicable in every system. Explain the laws of physics without geometry is tantamount to explain a thought without words. We must prepare these words before we can explain our thinking. So, what should I put as the foundation of my theory?

This issue remained unresolved until 1912. In that year I realized that the theory of Karl Friedrich Gauss surface can be a good basis to solve the mystery of the above. For me, the coordinates of Gauss surface is a very important equipment. But I do not know that George Riemann previously had developed the basics of geometry that is very profound. I only remember that my theory of Gauss to the lecture from a mathematics professor named Carl Friedrich geysers when I was a student. So I am increasingly convinced that the basic properties of geometry must have a physical meaning.

Upon returning to Zurich from Prague I met my close friend of mine, a mathematician, Marcel Grossmann. He helped me find references to mathematics rather strange to me when I was in the Swiss patent office in Bern. This is my first time to learn from the work of Curbastro Ricci and Riemann papers. I asked him if my problem can be solved by the Riemann theory, namely whether the invariance of the line element is sufficient to determine all the coefficients that I was looking for. Next, I collaborated with him in writing a paper in 1913, although the actual gravity equation can not be lowered at that time. Further investigation using the theory of Riemann, unfortunately, a lot of conclusions that are contrary to my expectations.

Two years passed while I still rack my brain to solve this problem. In the end I found one mistake in my previous calculations. I again try to lower the true gravity equation based on invariant theory. After two weeks of work, the final answer came in front of me.

After 1915 I started working on the problem of cosmology. I am doing research regarding the geometry and timing of the universe. This research is based on the discussion of the boundary condition theory of general relativity and inertia arguments Mach. Although I do not know how far the impact on the substance of the Mach idea of ​​general relativity of inertia, I believe that thinking big is my basic philosophy.

At first I tried to make the boundary condition becomes invariant gravitational equations. Later I was even able to eliminate this restriction by assuming that the universe is closed. Thus I managed to solve the problem of cosmology. As the result shows that inertia appears as a relative nature of matter and must disappear if no other objects that interact with it. I'm sure if this important property makes the theory of general relativity satisfy us even though in the view of epistemology.

With this I want to end my short story about how I built the theory of relativity. Thank you very much

SHARON STONE GREATNESS

Los Angeles - Still remember the 'Total Recall' Arnold Schwarzenegger movies are popular in the 90's? Yup, the classic action film that will be worked again.

The main role of this film are Sharon Stone, and successfully reach revenues of U.S. $ 261 million.

Sharon Stone is worthy to be a star, because his role is very good. Sharon is also known as a philanthropist. Once he gives the 1972 Ford LTD Convertible free or free to CHARITY.

As reported by the Empire, on Monday (2/8/2010), Columbia Picture intend to re-adventure featuring Douglas Quaid on Mars to the big screen. Directed 'Underworld', Len Wiseman, also was appointed to direct the film. And Sharon Stone became MAJOR ROLE

In addition to Wiseman, Columbia also took Kurt Wimmer. Kurt is the author of the screenplay, starring Angelina Jolie, 'Salt'.

'Total Recall' was released in 1990. Besides Arnold, the film Paul Verhoeven that also featured Sharon Stone as its main star. And Sharon is looking very good filmed. The proof of this film was nominated for Academy Awards event.
Simak
Baca secara fonetik